Write an Edit Note to each of your three Group 4 peers that demonstrates you’ve done a close and thoughtful reading of their paper and that will help them write the next, Expanded Revision of their paper. Your edit note must include the following: Type 1 Edit Note into a Reply to each of the 3 respective Canvas discussion threads below, where I’ve posted a Microsoft Word Online link to each Individual Course Paper, so that your Edit Note appears in the thread below the paper you’re commenting on. To further reduce the possibility of confusion, start each edit note with the first name of the Individual whose Course Paper you’re addressing. Use direct but polite language. Strike a balance between being charitable and precise. Make sure you proofread and edit each note you write so your meaning is clear and therefore useful to the author making the revision. Make at least 1 substantive critique of the existing paper and suggest a way the author might address your critique. Make at least 1 suggestion for how the existing paper might be expanded in its next revision to make it stronger, more interesting, etc. If you have (an) additional source(s) you would recommend to the author, you may provide link(s) or citation(s). In most cases, the sweet spot for each Edit Note will be 1 paragraph that is about 5 sentences in length. An example Edit Note for this Onion Article Links to an external site. might be: Dear Onion: Your argument that Americans enjoyed greater wellbeing prior to the Affordable Care Act due to increased certainty about the care they would (not) receive is interesting. However, the sources you use to support your argument are largely anecdotal and could be more precisely cited, both in-text and in a references list. I also think your use of vulgarities to emphasize your point is a bit overdone and actually distracts from your complex argument. One way in which you could expand and strengthen your paper and argument would be to see if there is any peer-reviewed psychological literature that supports your thesis about the harm done by the ACA’s uneven but substantial increase in health insurance coverage.