1. Write a summary about one of the primary readings before prompting zotGPT to provide the same summary. A competent summary is generally 150-250 words, provides an overview of the topics covered, and answers basic questions about the original text. This should include the main idea, supporting points/reasoning, and main evidence/methodology used.
2. Reflect on the differences between your summaries, and write a short reflection about how these tools can enrich our learning if we use them wisely. What did you learn from comparing summaries? Were any important details included or excluded? When thinking about genAI and how they ‘learn’/are ‘trained’/ ‘taught’ how might this relate to the legal and moral tensions in Euthyphro’s dilemma? Or, in light of Rawls’ theory of justice and the veil of ignorance/reflective equilibrium how might genAI be useful for creating a more just world and society?